Government • 2015

Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský

IČO 00020338

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

45.
ranking
64%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodávka kapalinového chromatografu s vysokorozlišovacím hmotnostním detektorema plynového chromatografu s hmotnostním detektorem typu trojitého kvadrupólu
Chromatografy
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup počítačů a notebooků pro UKZUZ 2014
Osobní počítače
4
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka maloparcelního sklízeče cukrovky s laboratoří
Žací a mlátící stroje
neuveden
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka osobních vozidel
Osobní vozidla
7
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka parcelního sklízeče obilovin a luskovin
Žací a mlátící stroje
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Hpst, s.r.o.
3 15,904,049
C System Cz a.s.
1 7,417,088
Řepařský institut, spol. s r.o.
1 6,150,000
Hyundai Motor Czech s.r.o.
1 5,200,000
P & L, spol. s r.o.
1 2,915,000
Other suppliers 3 7,874,793

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 60% (3 from 5)
Nonprice competition 40% (2 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

37%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 47,374,181
Unregulated purchases 297,579,272
Total 344,953,453

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

57%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Dodávka maloparcelního sklízeče cukrovky s laboratoří
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
6,150,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

59%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (1 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 58% (7 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 17% (2 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 8% (1 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

16%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 27% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.60 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

84%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (3 from 12)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.