Government • 2015

Státní veterinární správa

IČO 00018562

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

17.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Realizace nápravných opatření v resortu SVS a vzdělávání v oblasti procesního řízení
Podnikatelské a manažerské poradenství a související služby
3
Ø3 in industry
Analýza a návrh odborného informačního systému SVS
Analýza systémů a programovací služby
4
Ø3 in industry
Elektronický systém spisové služby SVS ČR v návaznosti na systém datových schránek
Systémy pro správu dokumentů
1
Ø1 in industry
Podpora provozu odborného informačního systému Státní veterinární správy v letech 2014 a 2015
Informační systémy
1
Ø1 in industry
Procesní analýza a návrh vrcholových nápravných opatření
Podnikatelské a manažerské poradenství a související služby
6
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Nexa, s.r.o.
2 26,736,000
Aquasoft spol. s r.o.
5 20,125,333
Icz a.s.
1 7,844,340
Gts Czech s.r.o.
2 7,421,089
Aqe advisors, a.s.
1 7,166,667
Other suppliers 7 13,846,906

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

36%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 83,140,338
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 558,316,521
Total 641,456,859

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

32%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 0.18

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

63%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (6 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 11% (2 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

88%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 93% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.20 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (1 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (1 from 18)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.