Government • 2015

Státní veterinární správa

IČO 00018562

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 61%
Largest contracts
Realizace nápravných opatření v resortu SVS a vzdělávání v oblasti procesního řízení
Podnikatelské a manažerské poradenství a související služby
Ø3 in industry
Analýza a návrh odborného informačního systému SVS
Analýza systémů a programovací služby
Ø3 in industry
Elektronický systém spisové služby SVS ČR v návaznosti na systém datových schránek
Systémy pro správu dokumentů
Ø1 in industry
Podpora provozu odborného informačního systému Státní veterinární správy v letech 2014 a 2015
Informační systémy
Ø1 in industry
Procesní analýza a návrh vrcholových nápravných opatření
Podnikatelské a manažerské poradenství a související služby
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Nexa, s.r.o.
2 26,736,000
Aquasoft spol. s r.o.
5 20,125,333
Icz a.s.
1 7,844,340
Gts Czech s.r.o.
2 7,421,089
Aqe advisors, a.s.
1 7,166,667
Other suppliers 7 13,846,906

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 83,140,338
Unregulated purchases 558,316,521
Total 641,456,859

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 0.18

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (6 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 11% (2 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 93% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.20 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (1 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (1 from 18)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.