Government • 2015

Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce

IČO 75014149

Good buyer. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

17.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kapalinový chromatograf s analyzátorem Time Of Flight (LC-TOF)
Hmotnostní spektrometry
4
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka a podpora videokonferenčního systému
Zařízení pro videokonference
4
Ø2 in industry
Kapalinový chromatograf s hmotnostním spektrometrem izotopových poměrů (LC-IRMS)
Chromatografy
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup 128 ks notebooků.
Přenosné počítače
4
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka komplexního informačního a docházkového systému pro vedení personální a mzdové agendy – nové vyhlášení
Automatizace administrativních prací
5
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Anamet s.r.o.
2 5,987,826
Hpst, s.r.o.
1 5,875,000
Gity, a.s.
1 5,101,608
Autocont Cz a.s.
2 5,062,810
Futura Soft, s.r.o.
7 4,704,000
Other suppliers 5 9,496,942

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

33%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 36,228,186
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 299,461,883
Total 335,690,070

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

46%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

56%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 38%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

39%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 46% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 11% (2 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (2 from 18)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.