Government • 2015

Státní zemědělský intervenční fond

IČO 48133981

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rámcová smlouva- Komunikační podpora značky KLASA na období 2012-2013
Reklamní a marketingové služby
5
Ø3 in industry
Obnova infratruktury informačního systému
Hlavní počítače
2
Ø2 in industry
Marketingová, mediální a PR kampaň prezentující regionální potraviny
Marketingové služby
5
Ø3 in industry
Rámcová smlouva - Komunikační podpora značky Regionální potravina v období 2014-2015
Reklamní a marketingové služby
5
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění provozu, rozvoje a servisu IS EKIS
Systémové a podpůrné služby
4
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Digitalcom, a.s.
1 310,000,000
O2 Czech Republic a.s.
6 200,132,967
Ogilvy & Mather spol. s r.o.
2 114,990,135
Vuste-apis, s.r.o.
2 64,000,000
Oracle Czech s.r.o.
1 49,114,800
Other suppliers 33 149,415,570

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

74%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 37% (7 from 19)
Division into lots 11% (2 from 19)
E-auction 0% (0 from 19)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

48%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 893,354,831
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 2,977,849,453
Total 3,871,204,284

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

71%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zajištění provozu, rozvoje a servisu IS AGIS (SOT)
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Krajní naléhavost
- 32,000,000
Služby hostingu infrastruktury
Krajní naléhavost
- 13,556,182
Zajištění maintenance operačních systémů AIX
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 12,399,745
Služby provozu datových a hlasových linek
Krajní naléhavost
- 9,417,905
Realizace výstavního stánku KLASA a zajištění služeb pro provoz stánku na výstavě SIAL v Paříži ve dnech 21.10.-25.10.2012
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
- 2,432,610

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 32%
Average requirements modifications count 0.16

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

50%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 45)
Final or estimated price not published 56% (25 from 45)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 45)
Missing supplier ID 20% (9 from 45)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 45)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 45)
Missing call for tenders 20% (9 from 45)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 45)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 45)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

30%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 54% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.81 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 45)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 27% (12 from 45)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.