State-owned enterprises • 2015

Povodí Moravy, s.p.

IČO 70890013

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

17.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Poskytování projektových, inženýrských a souvisejících odborně technických služeb v oblasti vodohospodářských staveb“
Studie proveditelnosti, poradenství, analýza
4
Ø3 in industry
„Morava, Olomouc - zvýšení kapacity koryta II.A etapa“
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi
5
Ø7 in industry
Morava, Uherské Hradiště, Staré Město- zvýšení kapacity koryta I.etapa
Výstavba ochranných hrází
4
Ø7 in industry
"Protipovodňová opatření Města Velké Meziříčí"
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi
5
Ø7 in industry
VD Plumlov - rekonstrukce návodního líce a koruny hráze
Výstavba ochranných hrází
5
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Aquatis a.s.
11 381,574,650
Strabag a.s.
3 290,838,698
Hochtief Cz a. s.
7 273,478,367
D.i.s., spol. s r.o.
2 175,343,701
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
4 147,273,227
Other suppliers 83 523,379,061

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (8 from 0)
Nonprice competition 17% (5 from 29)
Division into lots 7% (2 from 29)
E-auction 0% (0 from 29)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 29)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

86%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,796,820,465
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 655,499,535
Total 2,452,320,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Protipovodňová opatření Města Velké Meziříčí - dodatečné stavební práce
Not disclosed
- 23,560,469
Morava, Olomouc – zvýšení kapacity koryta II. A etapa – dodatečné stavební práce
Not disclosed
- 21,179,364
Technickobezpečnostní dohled (TBD) nad vodními díly I. a II. kategorie Povodí Moravy, s.p.
Not disclosed
- 17,219,346
ZKT Kurdějovského potoka
Not disclosed
- 9,005,357
Jihlava, Třebíč - zvýšení kapacity koryta, II. etapa - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
- 6,978,106

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

48%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 18%
Cancelled contracts 23%
Average requirements modifications count 0.37

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (2 from 110)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (27 from 110)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 110)
Missing supplier ID 5% (6 from 110)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 110)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 110)
Missing call for tenders 19% (21 from 110)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 110)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 110)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

17%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 24% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.19 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 1% (1 from 110)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 6% (7 from 110)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 110)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 110)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (1 from 110)
Supplier donating to political party 4% (4 from 110)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (14 from 110)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.