Small cities • 2016

Obec Kamenice

IČO 00240273

Good buyer. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

16.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy OÚ Kamenice
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Kamenice, oprava poškozené kanalizace po živelné události v 6/2013
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
2
Ø5 in industry
„Nákup techniky na omezení prašnosti v obci Kamenice“
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
3
Ø3 in industry
„REKONSTRUKCE VKP ALEJÍ V OBCI KAMENICE”
Zemědělské, lesnické, zahradnické služby a služby v oblasti akvakultury a včelařství
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

42%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Stavby Complet Technologic s.r.o.
1 11,075,855
Imos group s.r.o.
1 10,711,220
Kobit, spol. s r.o.
1 3,650,000
H - Rekultivace, a.s.
1 1,346,028

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 4)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 4)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 4)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 4)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 4)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 4)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 4)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 4)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

80%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 4)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (1 from 4)