Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Obec Kamenice

IČO 00240273

Good buyer. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

19.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Obec Kamenice - Navýšení kapacity ZŠ Kamenice
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
,,Navýšení kapacity ZŠ Kamenice 2. etapa“
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy OÚ Kamenice
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
„Oprava komunikace Lesní v linii stávající trasy komunikace“
Výstavba silnic
4
Ø8 in industry
„Kanalizace a ČOV Kamenice – zhotovitel projektové dokumentace pro provádění stavby a autorský dozor“
Architektonické, stavební, technické a inspekční služby
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

50%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 46,280,006
POZIMOS, a.s.
1 22,955,555
Stavby COMPLET Technologic s.r.o.
1 11,075,855
B E S s.r.o.
1 6,541,686
CERGOMONT s.r.o.
1 2,787,300
Other suppliers 4 9,738,618

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 115,086,269
Unregulated purchases -13,636,580
Total 101,449,689

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (1 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)