Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Městys Cerhenice

IČO 00235300

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Mateřská škola Cerhenice
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Cerhýnky - veřejná splašková kanalizace
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizačních sítí
5
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v Cerhenicích
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce, servis a údržba veřejného osvětlení v městysi Cerhenice a přilehlých obcích Cerhýnky a Radimek
Instalace a montáž osvětlovacích a signalizačních systémů
3
Ø3 in industry
Spolkový dům
Rekonstrukce budov
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

32%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Polabská stavební CZ, s.r.o.
5 65,767,132
Výstavba sítí Kolín a.s.
1 18,994,406
JOKAS s.r.o.
1 7,901,629
ELTODO-CITELUM, s.r.o.
1 6,647,804
ELTODO, a.s.
1 6,647,804

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 144,349,154
Unregulated purchases -132,873,892
Total 11,475,262

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

35%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

74%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (4 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 14% (2 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 11% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)