City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 22

IČO 00240915

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba MŠ Pitkovice
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Přístavba pavilonu ZŠ Jandusů - opakované zadávací řízení
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Dostavba pavilonu ZŠ Jandusů
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Snížení prašnosti na území MČ Praha 22
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
3
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ U Obory
Stavební práce
neuveden
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

33%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Prominecon Cz a.s.
1 31,282,298
Pradast, spol. s r.o.
2 27,773,508
Unikont Group s.r.o.
1 3,471,000
Vanderlaan s.r.o.
1 2,219,621

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 62%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 100% (3 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

44%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 1.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 20% (1 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (1 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)