Small cities • 2016

Město Němčice nad Hanou

IČO 00288497

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

24.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

73%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

51%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Commodum, spol. s r.o.
1 9,956,529
E.on Energie, a.s.
3 3,759,339
Q-coop spol. s r.o.
1 2,190,228
Minam servis a.s.
2 2,156,000
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 1,733,443
Other suppliers 1 1,467,384

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

72%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 33% (3 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

71%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (3 from 9)