Small cities • 2016

Město Lomnice Nad Popelkou

IČO 00275905

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

4.
ranking
87%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Město Lomnice nad Popelkou - cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Modernizace zázemí a výukových prostor pro potřebu ŠVP v ZŠ T.G. Masaryka Lomnice nad Popelkou
Stavební úpravy školních budov
5
Ø5 in industry
Snížení prašnosti v lokalitě Lomnice n. P.
Zametací vozy
2
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti MŠ Dášenka a budovy rozšířené polikliniky Lomnice nad Popelkou
Tepelné izolace
7
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce koupaliště - technologie Lomnice nad Popelkou
Instalace a montáž přístrojů a zařízení na čištění a filtrování vody
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
D - Bau s.r.o.
2 5,404,486
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 4,915,000
Helios Bau spol. s r.o.
1 3,635,254
Kobit, spol. s r.o.
1 3,282,000
Agriimport Plzeň, s.r.o.
1 3,154,500
Other suppliers 3 4,082,419

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

100%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

76%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (3 from 9)