Small cities • 2016

Město Slavkov u Brna

IČO 00292311

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodávka zemního plynu pro město Slavkov pro roky 2015 a 2016
Zemní plyn
7
Ø3 in industry
Obnova komplexu zámeckého parku a historických alejí – Slavkov u Brna
Zahradnické služby
4
Ø6 in industry
Přestupní uzel IDS Nádražní- Slavkov u Brna
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry
Efektivní elektronický úřad města Slavkov u Brna
Systémové a podpůrné služby
2
Ø1 in industry
Obnova historických alejí – Slavkov u Brna
Zahradnické služby
4
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Centropol Energy, a.s.
1 8,507,398
Kavyl, spol. s r.o.
1 6,474,852
Petr Vykrut
2 6,203,361
Skr stav, s.r.o.
1 4,949,390
C System Cz a.s.
1 3,731,567
Other suppliers 1 1,815,359

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 75% (3 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 25% (1 from 4)
Inovativni 0% ( from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 7)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 29% (2 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 7)