Small cities • 2016

Město Letovice

IČO 00280518

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sběrný dvůr odpadů Města Letovice
Výstavba zařízení na zpracování odpadu
9
Ø5 in industry
Lokální výstražný a varovný protipovodňový systém pro město Letovice
Prevence záplav
2
Ø3 in industry
Oprava opěrné zdi
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace panelového sídliště U Zámku v Letovicích - 4.etapa
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení stroje na úklid zpevněných cest
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Stylstav s.r.o.
1 10,799,900
Empemont s.r.o.
1 8,166,931
Sasta Cz,a.s.
1 6,410,358
Holas Cz s.r.o.
1 4,156,261
Hanes s.r.o.
1 3,414,000
Other suppliers 3 3,505,027

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
II/365 Letovice – Horní Poříčí, intravilán – vícepráce
Dodatečné práce
641,679

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)