Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Letovice

IČO 00280518

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

17%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Oprava opěrné zdi
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy městského úřadu v Letovicích
Rekonstrukce budov
2
Ø4 in industry
Lokální výstražný a varovný protipovodňový systém pro město Letovice
Prevence záplav
2
Ø3 in industry
Stavební úpravy mateřské školy Letovice, Třebětínská 28/19
Rekonstrukce budov
2
Ø4 in industry
Oprava opěrné zdi
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

41%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SASTA CZ, a.s.
2 19,360,276
Letostav, spol. s r.o.
2 18,366,871
EMPEMONT s.r.o.
1 8,166,931
Metrostav a.s.
1 641,679

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 100% (3 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 67,769,266
Unregulated purchases 238,477,796
Total 306,247,061

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
II/365 Letovice – Horní Poříčí, intravilán – vícepráce
Additional works , Outside directive scope
641,679

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.83 (average mistakes per contract)