Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Letovice

IČO 00280518

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Oprava opěrné zdi
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy městského úřadu v Letovicích
Rekonstrukce budov
Ø4 in industry
Lokální výstražný a varovný protipovodňový systém pro město Letovice
Prevence záplav
Ø3 in industry
Stavební úpravy mateřské školy Letovice, Třebětínská 28/19
Rekonstrukce budov
Ø4 in industry
Oprava opěrné zdi
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SASTA CZ, a.s.
2 19,360,276
Letostav, spol. s r.o.
2 18,366,871
1 8,166,931
Metrostav a.s.
1 641,679

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 100% (3 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 67,769,266
Unregulated purchases 238,477,796
Total 306,247,061

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
II/365 Letovice – Horní Poříčí, intravilán – vícepráce
Additional works , Outside directive scope

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.83 (average mistakes per contract)