Small cities • 2016

Městys Kamenice

IČO 00286079

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

5.
ranking
86%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

100%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Přírodě blízké protipovodňové opatření v městysi Kamenice
Výstavba vodních děl
21
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místní komunikace v ulici Ve Strážce, Kamenice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

12%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Sph stavby s.r.o.
1 10,984,564
M - Silnice a.s.
1 3,086,696

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 2)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 2)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 2)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 2)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 2)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 2)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 2)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 2)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 2)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 2)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 2)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 2)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 2)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 2)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 2)