Small cities • 2016

Město Žamberk

IČO 00279846

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

9.
ranking
85%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

55%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
1 6,819,804
Ekola České Libchavy s.r.o.
2 5,000,443
Ag Com, a.s.
1 2,167,210
Okrasné zahrady arboristika s.r.o.
1 1,116,257
green4plan s.r.o.
1 1,055,102
Other suppliers 2 1,330,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

100%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (1 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 12% (1 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 25% (2 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)