Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Stříbro

IČO 00260177

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

31%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
MATEŘSKÁ ŠKOLA PROKOPA HOLÉHO
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících vzdělání a výzkumu
1
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ Gagarinova Stříbro, projekt úspor energie
Speciální řemeslné stavební práce kromě střešních prací
5
Ø3 in industry
Stříbro - soubor městského opevnění, 1. etapa - oprava vnější a vnitřní zdi, aktualizace stavu 2013
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Chodník podél silnice II/605, ul. Plzeňská, Stříbro
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce silnice II/193, Palackého ulice Stříbro
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
15
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

29%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 58,997,892
SMP CZ, a.s.
2 18,101,475
STRABAG a.s.
3 12,147,317
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o.
1 3,230,900

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 33% (1 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 105,687,212
Unregulated purchases 327,072,504
Total 432,759,716

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 11% (1 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 22% (2 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

86%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.57 (average mistakes per contract)