Small cities • 2016

Obec Starý Jičín

IČO 00298425

Good buyer. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

13.
ranking
82%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY A PŘÍSTAVBA OBJEKTU VLČNOV U STARÉHO JIČÍNA
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy hřbitovní zdi, Starý Jičín
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření obce Starý Jičín
Systémy pro veřejný rozhlas
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

44%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Milimex S.a., odštěpný závod
1 7,648,212
Lesostavby Frýdek-místek a. s.
1 6,248,000
Empemont s.r.o.
1 5,607,042

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 3)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (1 from 3)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 3)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 3)
Missing buyer ID 33% (1 from 3)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 3)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 3)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 3)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 3)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 3)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 3)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 3)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 3)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 3)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 3)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (1 from 3)