Small cities • 2016

Město Mimoň

IČO 00260746

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění dodavatele služby údržba komunikací
Čistící a hygienické služby v městských a venkovských oblastech a související služby
2
Ø3 in industry
RPS - Mimoň, Sídliště pod Ralskem - Etapa A
Zakládání dálnic, silnic, ulic a stezek pro pěší
7
Ø5 in industry
Zlepšení tepelné ochrany Domava důchodců v Mimoni - II
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících k ubytování
16
Ø5 in industry
Správa a údržba veřejného osvětlení v Mimoni na rok 2013 - 2017
Údržba zařízení veřejného osvětlení a dopravních semaforů
6
Ø4 in industry
Nákup elektrické energie na Komoditní burze Praha pro město Mimoň
Elektrická energie
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

51%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Compag Cz s.r.o.
3 20,491,128
Strabag a.s.
1 7,495,608
Ft-stavby s.r.o.
1 4,190,881
Amper Market, a.s.
2 3,127,913
Česká pojišťovna a.s.
3 2,624,597
Other suppliers 4 4,742,431

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 100% (1 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (1 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (4 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 7% (1 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 7% (1 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 36% (5 from 14)