Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Mimoň

IČO 00260746

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění dodavatele služby údržba komunikací

2
Ø2 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti stavby Luční 530 a 653
Construction work for lodging buildings
4
Ø4 in industry
RS - Mimoň, Sídliště pod Ralskem - Etapa B
Foundation work for highways, roads, streets and footpaths
10
Ø6 in industry
RPS - Mimoň, Sídliště pod Ralskem - Etapa A

7
Ø6 in industry
Zlepšení tepelné ochrany Domava důchodců v Mimoni - II

16
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COMPAG CZ, s.r.o.
2 22,115,120
SYBAN, s.r.o.
1 15,425,000
STRABAG a.s.
1 7,495,609
FT-stavby s.r.o.
1 4,190,882
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 4,121,202
Other suppliers 7 12,277,074

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 73,207,830
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 252,114,105
Total 325,321,934

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup elektrické energie na Komoditní burze Praha pro město Mimoň
Not disclosed
Not disclosed Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

74%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (5 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 23% (3 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders