Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Mimoň

IČO 00260746

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění dodavatele služby údržba komunikací
Čistící a hygienické služby v městských a venkovských oblastech a související služby
2
Ø2 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti stavby Luční 530 a 653
Ubytovací a restaurační budovy
4
Ø4 in industry
RS - Mimoň, Sídliště pod Ralskem - Etapa B
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
10
Ø6 in industry
RPS - Mimoň, Sídliště pod Ralskem - Etapa A
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
7
Ø6 in industry
Zlepšení tepelné ochrany Domava důchodců v Mimoni - II
Ubytovací a restaurační budovy
16
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
COMPAG CZ, s.r.o.
2 22,115,120
SYBAN, s.r.o.
1 15,425,000
STRABAG a.s.
1 7,495,609
FT-stavby s.r.o.
1 4,190,882
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 4,121,202
Other suppliers 7 12,277,074

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 73,207,830
Unregulated purchases 252,114,105
Total 325,321,934

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Nákup elektrické energie na Komoditní burze Praha pro město Mimoň
Not disclosed
1,837,854

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

74%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (5 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 23% (3 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)