Small cities • 2016

Město Dobříš

IČO 00242098

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

13.
ranking
82%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Promart stavební společnost, s.r.o.
1 11,944,257
Strabag a.s.
1 6,281,241
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 5,673,490
Invessales, spol. s. r. o.
1 5,110,744
Amper Market, a.s.
2 2,784,956
Other suppliers 4 2,952,348

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

62%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Dobříš“
Not disclosed
1,425,296
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Dobříš“
Not disclosed
1,359,660
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Dobříš“
Not disclosed
1,136,904

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (3 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 20% (2 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 30% (3 from 10)