Small cities • 2016

Město Dobříš

IČO 00242098

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

13.
ranking
82%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Promart stavební společnost, s.r.o.
1 11,944,257
Strabag a.s.
1 6,281,241
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 5,673,490
Invessales, spol. s. r. o.
1 5,110,744
Amper Market, a.s.
2 2,784,956
Other suppliers 4 2,952,348

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

62%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Dobříš“
Not disclosed
- 1,425,296
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Dobříš“
Not disclosed
- 1,359,660
„Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Dobříš“
Not disclosed
- 1,136,904

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (3 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 20% (2 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 30% (3 from 10)