Small cities • 2016

Město Rousínov

IČO 00292281

Good buyer. Uncompetitive procedures are overused. The competition for contracts is high.

16.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

91%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sušilovo náměstí Rousínov, I. etapa
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
Rozšíření MŠ Rousínov
Stavební práce
20
Ø5 in industry
Město Rousínov - rekonstrukce budovy Záložny
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Rousínov, okr. Vyškov – pořízení nové cisternové automobilové stříkačky pro jednotku SDH Rousínov
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
3
Ø2 in industry
ZŠ Rousínov, ul. Tyršova - stavební úpravy
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Insta Cz s.r.o.
2 17,223,119
Zlínské stavby, a.s.
1 6,280,142
4p Invest, s.r.o.
1 4,885,587
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 4,366,600
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
3 4,260,282
Other suppliers 8 14,010,383

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

44%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rozšíření MŠ Rousínov
Not disclosed
6,280,142
Společná stezka pro chodce a cyklisty ul.Čechyňská II.
Not disclosed
3,201,726

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 3.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (2 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

74%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (1 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (4 from 16)