Small cities • 2016

Město Mikulov

IČO 00283347

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

95%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
MIKULOV - Oprava hlediště a technického zázemí amfiteátru
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
8
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ Mikulov, Hraničářů 617/E
Rekonstrukce budov
12
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ Valtická
Stavební úpravy školních budov
9
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy v lokalitě Svatý kopeček – kaple svatého Šebestiána, zvonice a schodiště k Božímu hrobu
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
9
Ø3 in industry
Dodání řešení technologického centra pro MěÚ Mikulov
Vícenásobné diskové pole nezávislých disků (RAID)
4
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební Firma Plus s.r.o.
1 13,773,342
Mbq-mikulov a.s.
1 9,920,632
Moravská stavební unie - Msu s.r.o.
1 5,469,906
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 4,871,254
Colas Cz, a.s.
2 4,665,347
Other suppliers 6 10,915,902

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

13%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 3.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (3 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 13)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (1 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (2 from 13)