Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Pacov

IČO 00248789

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

42%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PKS stavby a.s.
1 106,466,844
HORA s.r.o.
6 39,959,284
Metrostav a.s.
1 26,554,985
SYNER VHS Vysočina, a.s.
1 7,634,000
VHST s.r.o.
2 7,011,150
Other suppliers 8 10,627,268

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

72%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 233,237,789
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 216,536,501
Total 449,774,289

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
ZŠ Pacov náměstí – „Škola pro život“ – dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 2,962,729
Komplexní zateplení objektů ZŠ Za Branou - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 715,548
Pacov, ulice Španovského - stavební úpravy - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 357,054

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.60

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders