Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Pacov

IČO 00248789

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Novostavba domu sociálních služeb v Pacově
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry
Novostavba mateřské školky "Za Branou" v Pacově
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry
ZTV pro výstavbu rodinných domů, lokalita "U Unika" v Pacově - II. etapa výstavby - I. podetapa
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
Ø7 in industry
Pacov, ulice Španovského - stavební úpravy
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
Ø7 in industry
Zateplení mateřské školy Pacov, Jatecká
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PKS stavby a.s.
1 106,466,844
HORA s.r.o.
6 39,959,284
Metrostav a.s.
1 26,554,985
SYNER VHS Vysočina, a.s.
1 7,634,000
VHST s.r.o.
2 7,011,150
Other suppliers 8 10,627,268

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 233,237,789
Unregulated purchases 216,536,501
Total 449,774,289

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.60

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)