Small cities • 2016

Město Meziměstí

IČO 00272841

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is low. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

37.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

21%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Cyklostezky v příhraniční oblasti Meziměstska a Mieroszowska, úsek Starostín - Vižňov
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
4
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace ZŠ Meziměstí – objekt A a D
Stavební úpravy školních budov
2
Ø5 in industry
„Modernizace ZŠ Meziměstí“
Stavební úpravy školních budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Komunální zametací vůz – Meziměstí
Zametací vozy
2
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka dopravního automobilu pro hasiče
Hasičská vozidla
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

55%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 7,916,541
Vanderlaan s.r.o.
1 6,583,446
Broumovské stavební sdružení s.r.o.
1 4,669,852
Auto Sas s.r.o.
1 2,855,000
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 1,138,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

100%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

49%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 60% (3 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 5)