Small cities • 2016

Obec Jesenice

IČO 00241318

The competition for contracts is low. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

12%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy objektu čp. 77 obec Jesenice
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
„Snižování energetické náročnosti objektu obecního úřadu čp. 303 v Jesenici“
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu zdravotního střediska v Jesenici a půdní vestavba - III
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
ČOV Zdiměřice - rozšíření stávající ČOV
Stavební úpravy pro čistírny odpadních vod, čisticí stanice a spalovny odpadů
2
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení zametacího stroje pro obec Jesenice
Zametací vozy
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Dredger s.r.o.
1 9,329,529
Renastav s.r.o.
1 7,949,921
Rybář stavební s.r.o.
1 5,822,362
Hakov, a.s.
1 5,218,957
S A P spol. s r.o.
1 2,425,000
Other suppliers 4 6,604,219

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Inovativni 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

71%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 33% (3 from 9)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 9)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

93%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (1 from 9)