Small cities • 2016

Město Hrušovany nad Jevišovkou

IČO 00292877

Good buyer. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

16.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

78%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Tělocvična pro ZŠ Hrušovany nad Jevišovkou
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka elektřiny pro Město Hrušovany nad Jevišovkou
Elektrická energie
5
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka plynu pro Město Hrušovany nad Jevišovkou a jeho příspěvkové organizace v roce 2014
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry
Nová knihovna - vybavení nábytkem
Nábytek (včetně kancelářského), zařízení interiéru, domácí spotřebiče (mimo osvětlení) a čisticí prostředky
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

10%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Miloš Ryšavý, stavební a obchodní firma, s.r.o.
1 20,961,771
Amper Market, a.s.
1 2,315,500
Pragoplyn, a.s.
1 1,605,169
Čegan s.r.o.
1 764,437

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 4)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 4)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 4)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 4)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 4)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 4)
Call and award notices contradict each other 25% (1 from 4)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 4)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 4)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (1 from 4)