Small cities • 2016

Město Rožmitál pod Třemšínem

IČO 00243221

Good buyer. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

24.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

89%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a modernizace místních komunikací
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
24
Ø5 in industry
„Rekonstrukce a modernizace místních komunikací III.“
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
8
Ø5 in industry
„Rekonstrukce a modernizace místních komunikací II.“
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
11
Ø5 in industry
„Zavedení svozu bioodpadů v Rožmitále pod Třemšínem – svozový vůz“
Stroje pro nakládání nebo manipulaci
1
Ø3 in industry
„Zavedení svozu bioodpadů v Rožmitále pod Třemšínem – manipulátor s příslušenstvím“
Stroje pro nakládání nebo manipulaci
6
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
B E S s.r.o.
1 9,480,278
Eurovia Silba, a.s.
1 6,644,808
Silnice Chmelíř s.r.o.
1 5,293,762
Charvát Cts a.s.
1 1,985,000
První Chráněná Dílna s.r.o.
1 1,799,000
Other suppliers 1 1,755,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

35%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 83% (5 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (2 from 6)