Small cities • 2016

Město Heřmanův Městec

IČO 00270041

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

32%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti budov Domova pro seniory Heřmanův Městec
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti sokolovny v Heřmanově Městci
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce č.p. 801 v Heřmanově Městci
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření města Heřmanův Městec
Rozhlas, televize, komunikace, telekomunikace a související zařízení
3
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka automobilového nosiče kontejnerů s hákovým natahovačem, včetně hydraulické ruky a 3 ks velkoobjemových kontejnerů pro město Heřmanův Městec
Vozidla pro lisování odpadků
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ermont spol. s r. o.
1 14,824,490
Abp Consulting, a.s.
1 9,865,531
Rudolf Kmoch, spol. s r.o.
1 8,400,271
Empemont s.r.o.
1 3,707,940
Komersia Auto s.r.o.
1 2,100,000
Other suppliers 1 2,065,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Inovativni 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 17% (1 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 33% (2 from 6)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 6)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

82%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 50% (3 from 6)