Small cities • 2016

Obec Bolatice

IČO 00299847

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

90%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy a přístavba drážní budovy v Bolaticích na dům se sociálními byty
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Realizaci čtyř fotovoltaických elektráren na střechách obecních budov
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE UL. HORNÍ V BOLATICÍCH
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Snížení prašnosti ze zpevněných cest v Bolaticích
Různé čisticí stroje
2
Ø2 in industry
Hasičská zbrojnice Bolatice – zateplení
Tepelné izolace
5
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

49%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Fichna - Hudeczek a.s.
1 6,997,903
Ecosun Services s.r.o.
1 3,096,689
Nosta, s.r.o.
1 2,777,000
Auto Sas s.r.o.
1 1,129,000
Rybka - stavby a služby, s.r.o.
1 1,066,394

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

15%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (1 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 60% (3 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

49%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (1 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 60% (3 from 5)