Small cities • 2016

Město Město Albrechtice

IČO 00296228

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

5.
ranking
86%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

96%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace retenční nádrže Celňák
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Snížení imisní zátěže z dopravy ve městě Město Albrechtice
Motorová vozidla pro zvláštní účely
4
Ø3 in industry
Rozšíření separace a svozu bioodpadů ve Městě Albrechticích
Motorová vozidla
6
Ø3 in industry
Obnova vegetačních prvků zámeckého parku v Linhartovech
Kácení stromů
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

54%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ekostavby Brno, a.s.
1 3,922,944
Jila Wagen, a.s.
1 2,445,000
Technocar s.r.o.
1 2,419,000
Zahrada Olomouc s. r. o.
1 2,087,948

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

55%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 4)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 4)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 4)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 4)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 4)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 4)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 4)
Missing call for tenders 50% (2 from 4)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 4)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 4)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 4)