Small cities • 2016

Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou

IČO 00275336

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Regenerace pěší zóny Havlíčkovy ul., Rychnov nad Kněžnou
Práce na povrchové úpravě ulic
6
Ø5 in industry
Odkanalizování místních částí města Rychnov nad Kněžnou – lokalita Sibiř, Štemberkova ul.
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
15
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy vodovodu a kanalizace v hlavní komunikaci Lipovka
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
10
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu čp. 515, ul. Ekologická Rychnov nad Kněžnou
Bytová výstavba
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce Masarykovy ulice v Rychnově nad Kněžnou
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

56%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Matex Hk s.r.o.
5 39,851,719
M - Silnice a.s.
2 23,403,017
R E M I N G , s. r. o.
2 8,546,950
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 7,194,797
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o.
1 4,259,918
Other suppliers 7 12,094,969

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

81%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

68%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 11% (2 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 42% (8 from 19)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

68%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 19)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier donating to political party 26% (5 from 19)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 16% (3 from 19)