Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou

IČO 00275336

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

43.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
KVIS Pardubice a.s.
1 26,091,997
M-SILNICE a.s.
4 25,391,150
MATEX HK s.r.o.
3 14,079,647
MARHOLD a.s.
1 11,994,693
R E M I N G, s. r. o.
3 7,673,766
Other suppliers 12 44,286,164

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 167,318,326
Unregulated purchases 390,809,430
Total 558,127,756

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

69%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (2 from 24)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 24)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 17% (4 from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

65%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.75 (average mistakes per contract)