Small cities • 2016

Město Horní Slavkov

IČO 00259322

The competition for contracts is low. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

32%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení vybraných objektů občanské vybavenosti
Tepelné izolace
11
Ø6 in industry
Revitalizace lesoparku a environmentální stezka (OŘ/1/2013/OKST)
Krajinné úpravy parků
2
Ø5 in industry
Konsolidace HW a SW MěÚ Horní Slavkov (2015/3/ZPŘ/OKST)
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø2 in industry
Bezbariérové úpravy DPS Poštovní ul. Horní Slavkov (2015/5/ZPŘ/OKST)
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
4
Ø5 in industry
Bezbariérové úpravy MKS Horní Slavkov (2015/8/ZPŘ/OKST)
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících k pořádání uměleckých představení
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 5,999,999
Isso - Inženýrské stavby Sokolov, s. r. o.
1 5,424,473
Colas Cz, a.s.
2 4,985,069
Miroslava Slepičková
1 4,427,420
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o.
1 3,012,323
Other suppliers 3 6,593,142

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Lots 75% (3 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 22% (2 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 11% (1 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

74%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 22% (2 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 44% (4 from 9)