Small cities • 2016

Město Uhlířské Janovice

IČO 00236527

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

37%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

36%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Abp Consulting, a.s.
2 16,695,263
Sládek Group, a.s.
1 8,821,669
Silmex s.r.o.
3 5,891,189

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
JŘBU - Dodatečné stavební práce k akci: Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy ZŠ Uhlířské Janovice v ulici Komenského
Dodatečné práce
1,274,096
Dodatečné stavební práce v ulicích Topolova - SO 102 chodník, úpravy vjezdů
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Dodatečné práce
95,971
Dodatečné stavební práce v ulicích Topolova - CO 102 schodiště
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Dodatečné práce
15,864

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 33% (2 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 50% (3 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (2 from 6)