Small cities • 2016

Obec Dambořice

IČO 00284840

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

91%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dambořice - lokalita "Spálený" - inženýrské sítě
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
11
Ø5 in industry
Intenzifikace ČOV Dambořice
Výstavba čistíren odpadních vod
5
Ø4 in industry
Dambořice - lokalita "Spálený" - inženýrské sítě - dodatečné stavební práce
Stavební práce
neuveden
Ø5 in industry
DAMBOŘICE - rekonstrukce kanalizace v ul. Za Humny a dostavba dešťové kanalizace z trati Dubová - Chrastě
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Snížení prašnosti na území obce Dambořice
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
4
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

20%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Skanska a.s.
2 56,831,629
Vhs Brno, a.s.
1 12,599,129
Inženýrské stavby Hodonín, s.r.o.
1 4,322,500
Traktorservis-ml, s.r.o.
1 4,082,176
Aqua Procon s.r.o.
1 798,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

78%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Dambořice - lokalita "Spálený" - inženýrské sítě - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
4,617,926

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

29%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 17% (1 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (2 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 17% (1 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (1 from 6)