Small cities • 2016

Obec Třanovice

IČO 00576921

Good buyer. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

32.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

80%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Komunitní centrum v Třanovicích – 1.etapa
Výstavba společenských, správních a kulturních center
10
Ø2 in industry
SEN centrum v Třanovicích 1. stavba – Bytový dům
Výstavba bytových domů
6
Ø5 in industry
SEN centrum v Třanovicích 1. stavba - Bytový dům
Výstavba bytových domů
6
Ø5 in industry
SEN – centrum sociálních služeb v Třanovicích
Rekonstrukce budov
6
Ø5 in industry
Lesopark a zeleň v obci Třanovice
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

3%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Vapes Ce s.r.o.
5 38,070,465
Hochtief Cz a. s.
1 3,758,632

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Komunitní centrum v Třanovicích – 1.etapa - dodatečné práce č.1
Dodatečné práce
1,230,236

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 6)