Small cities • 2016

Město Bojkovice

IČO 00290807

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kanalizace Bojkovice
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
4
Ø5 in industry
Náměstí města Bojkovice
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace centrální části Města Bojkovice
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Hasičská vozidla
3
Ø2 in industry
Konsolidace IT infrastruktury a nové služby Města Bojkovice
Datová zařízení
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

20%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Imos group s.r.o.
2 63,388,620
Vodohospodářské stavby Javorník-cz s.r.o.
2 9,929,817
Kobit - Thz s.r.o.
1 4,220,000
Geovap, spol. s r.o.
1 2,498,945
Hagemann a.s.
1 1,939,000
Other suppliers 6 4,758,014

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Bojkovice - třídíme odpad (dílčí plnění č. 1 - Vozidlo, nosič kontejnerů, vanový kontejner)
Not disclosed
1,939,000
Úvěr, Město Bojkovice
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
1,869,426

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 3.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 54% (7 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (1 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (1 from 13)