Small cities • 2016

Město Dobrovice

IČO 00237663

The competition for contracts is low. Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

19%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vstupní objekt základní školy Dobrovice
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy a přístavba v Základní škole v Dobrovici - 1.etapa
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy a přístavba v Základní škole v Dobrovici – 1.etapa
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení stroje na úklid zpevněných cest nebo silničních komunikací za účelem snížení prašnosti ve městě Dobrovice
Ostatní účelové stroje
2
Ø2 in industry
„Svoz bioodpadu v Dobrovici“
Vozidla pro svoz odpadků a odpadních vod
4
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

54%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Zeta Benátky s.r.o.
1 12,874,000
Limistav s.r.o.
2 8,268,597
Bak stavební společnost, a.s.
1 6,870,382
Hanes s.r.o.
1 3,333,850
Fornal trading s.r.o.
1 1,623,000
Other suppliers 2 476,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

58%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

72%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (1 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 25% (2 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

53%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 25% (2 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 62% (5 from 8)