Small cities • 2016

Obec Ratíškovice

IČO 00285242

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Aktivní centrum - obec Ratíškovice
Stavební práce
16
Ø5 in industry
Výměna zdroje vytápění v objektu základní školy v obci Ratíškovice
Tepelná čerpadla
2
Ø3 in industry
Rozšíření MŠ Ratíškovice
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Zahrady v přírodním stylu mateřské školy "Sluníčko" a U Jezérka" v Ratíškovicích
Vybavení hřišť
6
Ø4 in industry
Dovybavení sběrného dvora odpadů Ratíškovice
Různá strojní zařízení pro všeobecné účely a speciální strojní zařízení
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

28%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pozimos, a.s.
1 45,952,786
Cergomont s.r.o.
1 6,386,850
Iss stavtrade s.r.o.
1 4,832,931
Tr Antoš s.r.o.
1 3,253,788
Mouder s.r.o.
1 2,731,740
Other suppliers 3 5,607,880

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 50% (1 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

82%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (3 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

66%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (2 from 8)