Small cities • 2016

Obec Jetřichov

IČO 00654116

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

28%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Splašková kanalizace Jetřichov - dodatečné stavební práce I
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Splašková kanalizace Jetřichov - dodatečné stavební práce
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Splašková kanalizace Jetřichov
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
16
Ø5 in industry
Jetřichov – PASA, sanační zásah
Čištění nebo sanace znečištěné půdy
3
Ø4 in industry
Splašková kanalizace Jetřichov - kanalizační přípojky
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

12%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Aquasys spol. s r.o.
4 114,717,960
Geotest, a.s.
1 30,142,600
Ndcon s.r.o.
1 1,188,250

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

4%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Splašková kanalizace Jetřichov - dodatečné stavební práce I
Dodatečné práce
38,312,192
Splašková kanalizace Jetřichov - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
38,184,033
Splašková kanalizace Jetřichov - kanalizační přípojky
Dodatečné práce
5,404,101

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (2 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 17% (1 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 6)