Small cities • 2016

Město České Velenice

IČO 00246433

The competition for contracts is high. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

71.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

83%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy budovy kina
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací Husova a Barákova
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy a zateplení mateřské školy
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
5
Ø5 in industry
ZTV Pastviny - II. etapa
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Arstav s.r.o.
1 13,726,852
Lesostavby Třeboň a.s.
1 12,259,071
Dudystav s.r.o.
1 7,777,325
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 5,985,475
Strabag a.s.
1 3,949,322
Other suppliers 1 2,086,930

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (2 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (1 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 33% (2 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 17% (1 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 17% (1 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (1 from 6)