Small cities • 2016

Město Ivančice

IČO 00281859

Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal. Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace náhonu a slepého ramene v údolní nivě Oslavy
Výkopové a zemní práce
3
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti ZŠ T. G. Masaryka v Ivančicích
Stavební práce
17
Ø5 in industry
Svoz a likvidace odpadu pro Město Ivančice
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
2
Ø3 in industry
"ZATEPLENÍ BUDOVY OSČ, PETRA BEZRUČE 4, IVANČICE"
Stavební úpravy domů
4
Ø4 in industry
„STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY BÝVALÉ MŠ KOMENSKÉHO NÁM. 7 V IVANČICÍCH“
Stavební úpravy domů
5
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kavyl, spol. s r.o.
2 12,143,974
3v & H, s.r.o.
1 11,349,999
Suez Využití zdrojů a.s.
1 5,924,754
Skr stav, s.r.o.
2 5,024,933
Baumat,spol.s.r.o.
3 4,168,489
Other suppliers 5 4,899,981

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

67%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Division into lots 20% (1 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (5 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 21% (3 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

70%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (2 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (2 from 14)