Small cities • 2016

Obec Mukařov

IČO 00240508

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavba vodovodu Region Jih – III. Etapa, 1. část
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
2
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba zděné přístavby ZŠ Mukařov
Výstavba základních škol
7
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba Mateřské školy Mukařov
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba vodovodních přípojek, Mukařov-Srbín
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
3
Ø5 in industry
Výkon inženýrské činnosti ve stadiu přípravy, realizace a kolaudaci stavby - Vodovod Region Jih - III. Etapa, 1. část
Vodovody
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

38%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Pohl cz, a.s.
1 38,232,752
Pozimos, a.s.
1 24,988,845
Haas Fertigbau Chanovice s.r.o.
1 8,463,721
Stavitelství Řehoř, s.r.o.
1 2,131,472
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s.
1 939,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

35%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 60% (3 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

44%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 20% (1 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 40% (2 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 5)