Small cities • 2016

Město Chropyně

IČO 00287245

Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kompostárna pro město Chropyně
Kompostovače
2
Ø3 in industry
Kompostárna pro město Chropyně
Kompostovače
3
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení objektu a provedení nové střechy MŠ Tyršova v Chropyni
Tepelné izolace
25
Ø6 in industry
Zateplení objektu a provedení nové střechy MŠ Tyršova v Chropyni
Tepelné izolace
25
Ø6 in industry
RPS – Chropyně, Regenerace panelového sídliště – X. etapa
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Energreen Projekt s.r.o.
2 7,566,000
Energo Ipt s.r.o.
2 5,951,400
Biopas, spol. s r.o.
2 2,937,242
Tufír, spol. s r.o.
1 2,474,285
Zahrada Olomouc s. r. o.
1 953,466

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (3 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 12% (1 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 25% (2 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)