Small cities • 2016

Město Zubří

IČO 00304492

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Prodloužení splaškové kanalizace Zubří
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
13
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření pro město Zubří
Prevence záplav
3
Ø3 in industry
"Zateplení Domu služeb v Zubří"
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Úspora energií pro ZŠ Zubří
Stavební úpravy školních budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace budovy městského úřadu v Zubří
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Commodum, spol. s r.o.
2 9,112,139
Bártek Rozhlasy, s.r.o.
1 5,003,650
Mézl a Janíček s.r.o.
1 4,152,568
Jasy Vsetín s.r.o.
1 3,287,443
Daniš Davaztechnik s.r.o.
1 1,652,892
Other suppliers 3 3,354,354

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

54%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (3 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 11% (1 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 44% (4 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

73%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 22% (2 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (2 from 9)