Small cities • 2016

Město Žlutice

IČO 00255181

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení hlavní budovy ZŠ ve Žluticích
Stavební úpravy školních budov
5
Ø5 in industry
Realizace úspor energie MŠ Žlutice - Objekt A + B
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
4
Ø5 in industry
Sběrný dvůr Žlutice
Nádoby na odpad
3
Ø3 in industry
„Zateplení školní družiny ZŠ Žlutice“
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření města Žlutice
Prevence záplav
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

39%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Smp Cz, a.s.
2 13,836,147
Drops Group a.s.
2 6,021,226
Gkr Steel s.r.o.
1 2,880,000
Bártek Rozhlasy, s.r.o.
1 1,613,020
Zahradní a parková spol. s r.o.
1 1,027,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Realizace úspor MŠ Žlutice - Objekt A+B - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
- 206,634

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

66%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 43% (3 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 43% (3 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

84%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 57% (4 from 7)