Small cities • 2016

Obec Velim

IČO 00235865

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

23%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výběr provozovatele vodohospodářského majetku obce Velim
Provoz vodovodů
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce mateřské školy Velim
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
4
Ø5 in industry
Vístavba víceúčelového hřiště se zázemím
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
1
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba víceúčelového hřiště se zázemím
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce mateřské školy Velim - uplatnění opčního práva
Rekonstrukce budov
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

20%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Geosan Stavební a.s.
4 56,225,798
Vodos s.r.o.
1 28,812,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

36%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (2 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 20% (1 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 60% (3 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

84%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 20% (1 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 5)