Small cities • 2016

Město Nové Strašecí

IČO 00244155

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nové Strašecí – kanalizace – Pecínov
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizačních sítí
16
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu Haly BIOS v Novém Strašecí
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
5
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu B polikliniky v Novém Strašecí
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v ulicích Mšecká a Sportovní – Nové Strašecí
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v ulicích Ke Stadionu, U Školy a Poděbradova, Nové Strašecí
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

74%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Investice a stavební práce, s.r.o.
3 12,688,104
Severočeská stavební, a.s.
1 12,679,697
Silba-elstav s.r.o.
1 7,792,446
Froněk, spol. s r.o.
1 6,666,483
Viamo Praha, spol. s r.o.
1 5,414,341
Other suppliers 7 15,065,166

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

34%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 64% (9 from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

74%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 7% (1 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 36% (5 from 14)