Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Nové Strašecí

IČO 00244155

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

84%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a přístavba základní školy, Nové Strašecí
Stavební práce
17
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu Haly BIOS v Novém Strašecí
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
5
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu B polikliniky v Novém Strašecí
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v ulicích Mšecká a Sportovní – Nové Strašecí
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu školní jídelny Palackého 1140, Nové Strašecí
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

24%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Zlínstav a.s.
1 87,431,190
Investice a stavební práce, s.r.o.
1 7,965,444
SILBA-Elstav s.r.o.
1 7,792,446
Froněk, spol. s r.o.
1 6,666,484
PRO URBAN s.r.o.
1 5,888,398
Other suppliers 3 8,862,338

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (3 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

98%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 153,625,827
Unregulated purchases 6,720,893
Total 160,346,720

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

17%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 67%
Average requirements modifications count 3.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 60% (6 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 13% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.25 (average mistakes per contract)